The New School -- Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy | Budget Equity Project logo

OhioToledo

See how Toledo performed on our equity assessment of its ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Fund investment strategy.

Total Equity Focused ARPA Funds

$32,578,700$32,578,700

Overall Score

High

Featured Case Study

Eliminating Medical Debt, No Strings Attached

Toledo, Ohio joined forces with Lucas County on a $1.6 million program to cancel residents’ medical debts, partnering with the nonprofit Undue Medical Debt. To date, the effort has cleared the debts of 35,000 Toledo residents and 113,000 residents of Lucas County and the broader metropolitan region served by Toledo’s hospital systems.

case study

ARPA Equity Assessment of Toledo, OH

Overall Equity Focus

highHigh

Was racial and economic equity an explicit focus of the jurisdiction's ARPA investment strategy?

Equity Conscious
checkmark icon95% of locations met this criterion.
Race Conscious
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Equity as a Priority
checkmark icon86% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Decision Making Tools and Resources

middleMiddle

Are equity tools, frameworks, and structures in place to support equitable investment project identification, design, and implementation?

Equity Principles
checkmark icon38% of locations met this criterion.

The City of Toledo used a “SMART“ analysis (Sustainability; Meeting the U.S. Treasury’s guidelines; Accountability; Return on investment; and Transparency) to ensure each ARPA-funded project drives equitable and sustainable change in the community.

Equity Policies
x icon24% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Framework
x icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Staffing
x icon51% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Tools
x icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Data Disaggregation
checkmark icon48% of locations met this criterion.
Geographic Targeting via QCTs
checkmark icon72% of locations met this criterion.
Neighborhood Risk/Vulnerability Mapping
x icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Community Engagement

highHigh

Did the jurisdiction engage community members in decision making about the ARPA funds, conduct targeted outreach to historically excluded communities, and implement strategies to reach underserved communities?

Broad Community Engagement
checkmark icon94% of locations met this criterion.
Targeted Outreach
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Engagement
checkmark icon54% of locations met this criterion.

Equitable Labor Practices

highHigh

Does the jurisdiction use best practices for ensuring public investments deliver family-supporting jobs to residents who have faced barriers to good jobs and economic prosperity?

Targeted or Local Hiring
checkmark icon27% of locations met this criterion.
Living Wage
checkmark icon12% of locations met this criterion.
Prevailing Wage
checkmark icon52% of locations met this criterion.
Project Labor Agreement
checkmark icon22% of locations met this criterion.
Community Benefits Agreements
x icon8% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Investments

middleMiddle

Did the jurisdiction make investments that have the potential to advance equity by targeting the communities most harmed by the pandemic and addressing systemic inequities?

Good Jobs
x icon56% of locations met this criterion.
Income and Wealth
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Business Development
checkmark icon58% of locations met this criterion.
Housing Security
checkmark icon74% of locations met this criterion.
Food Security
x icon57% of locations met this criterion.
Health Equity
checkmark icon73% of locations met this criterion.
Digital Equity
x icon41% of locations met this criterion.
Early Childhood
checkmark icon30% of locations met this criterion.
Quality Child Care
x icon29% of locations met this criterion.
Youth & School-Aged Children
checkmark icon57% of locations met this criterion.
Community Infrastructure
checkmark icon57% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Infrastructure
x icon28% of locations met this criterion.
Community Based Organizations
x icon60% of locations met this criterion.
Community Safety & Justice
checkmark icon51% of locations met this criterion.
Policing (Negative Points)
checkmark icon45% of locations met this criterion.
Extent of Investment (% of Spending)
47%41% is the average across all locations.
Extent of Investment (% of Projects)
74%48% is the average across all locations.

Transparency & Accountability

highHigh

Does the jurisdiction set performance goals, collect data to monitor progress toward equitable outcomes, and provide the public with information about how funds are being used?

Equity Outcomes
checkmark icon55% of locations met this criterion.
Public Data
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
ARPA Website
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Performance Measures
checkmark icon75% of locations met this criterion.

The Equity Focus of Toledo's ARPA Investments

Primary Policy Area
Amount
Percentage
Community infrastructure
$15,628,700
22.6%
Income and wealth
$9,400,000
13.6%
Housing security
$3,800,000
5.5%
Youth and school-aged children
$2,000,000
2.9%
Early childhood
$1,250,000
1.8%
Inclusive business development
$500,000
0.7%
Health equity
$0
0.0%
Community safety and justice
$0
0.0%
Equity infrastructure
$0
0.0%
Not equity focused or unknown
$36,722,760
53.0%

$32,578,700

  of $69,301,460 funds budgeted as of July 2023 (47.0%) were equity focused
View Detailed Investments