The New School -- Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy | Budget Equity Project logo

WashingtonSeattle

See how Seattle performed on our equity assessment of its ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Fund investment strategy.

Total Equity Focused ARPA Funds

$137,467,338$137,467,338

Overall Score

High

Featured Case Study

Ensuring New Development Delivers Career Pathways to Workers in Disinvested Communities through Priority Hire

Seattle, Washington strengthened its landmark Priority Hire program with $350,000 in ARPA funds, enhancing access to construction careers for women, people of color, and residents in economically distressed areas, ensuring ongoing support for stable and sustainable employment.

case study

ARPA Equity Assessment of Seattle, WA

Overall Equity Focus

highHigh

Was racial and economic equity an explicit focus of the jurisdiction's ARPA investment strategy?

Equity Conscious
checkmark icon95% of locations met this criterion.
Race Conscious
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Equity as a Priority
checkmark icon86% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Decision Making Tools and Resources

highHigh

Are equity tools, frameworks, and structures in place to support equitable investment project identification, design, and implementation?

Equity Principles
checkmark icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Seattle’s city departments are required to design programs using equity principles including: 1) directing funding to the groups most impacted by the pandemic; 2) identifying whether the programs will increase or decrease racial equity; and 3) carefully thinking through how to advance opportunities and minimize harms.

Equity Policies
checkmark icon24% of locations met this criterion.

In 2004, Seattle launched the Race and Social Justice initiative (RSJI), which lays out the following goals and strategies: 1) to end racial and social disparities internal to the City by improving workforce equity; 2) increasing city employees’ RSJI knowledge and tools; 3) increasing contracting equity; 4) to strengthen the way Seattle engages the community and provides services by improving existing services using RSJI best practices; 5) enhancing immigrants’ and refugees’ access to city services; and 6) to eliminate race-based disparities in the community. Building on the commitment to the RSJI, ARPA programs are selected and designed with a race and social justice lens.

Equity Framework
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.

In 2021, Seattle developed an equity framework to select, design, and swiftly allocate ARPA funds to those most affected by the pandemic. Under this framework, city departments must design programs using equity principles, identify the pandemic-related harm addressed, the beneficiaries, and if recipients were disproportionately impacted. They must also assess the impact on racial equity, considering ways to enhance opportunities and reduce harms.

Equity Staffing
checkmark icon51% of locations met this criterion.

The Race and Social Justice Initiative (RSJI) is implemented throughout city departments by the leadership of the RSJI Core Team. This team comprises staff from over 10 of Seattle’s departments.

Equity Tools
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.

Seattle used the geographic location of program activity to understand how well programs serve equity goals through the Race and Social Equity Composite Index map. The Seattle Office of Planning and Community Development (OPCD) developed the index to provide city departments with a common starting point to identify the areas of Seattle that experience higher levels of race-based disparity. The index combines data on race, ethnicity, English-learner status, immigrant status, socioeconomic disadvantages, health disadvantages, and disability.

Data Disaggregation
checkmark icon48% of locations met this criterion.
Geographic Targeting via QCTs
checkmark icon72% of locations met this criterion.
Neighborhood Risk/Vulnerability Mapping
checkmark icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Community Engagement

highHigh

Did the jurisdiction engage community members in decision making about the ARPA funds, conduct targeted outreach to historically excluded communities, and implement strategies to reach underserved communities?

Broad Community Engagement
checkmark icon94% of locations met this criterion.
Targeted Outreach
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Engagement
checkmark icon54% of locations met this criterion.

Equitable Labor Practices

This section of the assessment was omitted for jurisdictions that reported $0 in spending infrastructure projects (to which these labor practices would apply).

Equity Investments

highHigh

Did the jurisdiction make investments that have the potential to advance equity by targeting the communities most harmed by the pandemic and addressing systemic inequities?

Good Jobs
checkmark icon62% of locations met this criterion.
Income and Wealth
checkmark icon71% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Business Development
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Housing Security
checkmark icon82% of locations met this criterion.
Food Security
checkmark icon63% of locations met this criterion.
Health Equity
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Digital Equity
checkmark icon45% of locations met this criterion.
Early Childhood
checkmark icon33% of locations met this criterion.
Quality Child Care
checkmark icon32% of locations met this criterion.
Youth & School-Aged Children
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Community Infrastructure
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Infrastructure
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Community Based Organizations
checkmark icon67% of locations met this criterion.
Community Safety & Justice
checkmark icon56% of locations met this criterion.
Policing (Negative Points)
x icon50% of locations met this criterion.
Extent of Investment (% of Spending)
58%46% is the average across all locations.
Extent of Investment (% of Projects)
62%58% is the average across all locations.

Transparency & Accountability

highHigh

Does the jurisdiction set performance goals, collect data to monitor progress toward equitable outcomes, and provide the public with information about how funds are being used?

Equity Outcomes
checkmark icon55% of locations met this criterion.
Public Data
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
ARPA Website
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Performance Measures
checkmark icon75% of locations met this criterion.

The Equity Focus of Seattle's ARPA Investments

Primary Policy Area
Amount
Percentage
Housing security
$55,814,635
23.8%
Income and wealth
$31,327,632
13.4%
Inclusive business development
$12,980,395
5.5%
Good jobs
$9,132,891
3.9%
Food security
$8,542,457
3.6%
Community-based organizations
$8,225,000
3.5%
Quality child care
$6,000,000
2.6%
Community infrastructure
$2,500,000
1.1%
Equity infrastructure
$920,995
0.4%
Community safety and justice
$698,333
0.3%
Health equity
$600,000
0.3%
Digital equity
$500,000
0.2%
Early childhood
$225,000
0.1%
Not equity focused or unknown
$96,854,684
41.3%

$137,467,338

  of $234,322,022 funds budgeted as of July 2023 (58.7%) were equity focused
View Detailed Investments