The New School -- Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy | Budget Equity Project logo

PennsylvaniaPittsburgh

See how Pittsburgh performed on our equity assessment of its ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Fund investment strategy.

Total Equity Focused ARPA Funds

$82,078,811$82,078,811

Overall Score

Low

ARPA Equity Assessment of Pittsburgh, PA

Overall Equity Focus

highHigh

Was racial and economic equity an explicit focus of the jurisdiction's ARPA investment strategy?

Equity Conscious
checkmark icon95% of locations met this criterion.
Race Conscious
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Equity as a Priority
checkmark icon86% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Decision Making Tools and Resources

lowLow

Are equity tools, frameworks, and structures in place to support equitable investment project identification, design, and implementation?

Equity Principles
checkmark icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Pittsburgh’s Mayor Gainey set three goals for the allocation of the federal funds from the ARPA program: safe neighborhoods, welcoming communities, and thriving people. These goals cover multiple critical areas such as housing, environment, resident empowerment, economic mobility, and equity. Increasing equity is a long-term goal for the City and is key in every step taken in developing ARPA programs, policies, and practices.

Equity Policies
x icon24% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Framework
x icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Staffing
x icon51% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Tools
x icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Data Disaggregation
checkmark icon48% of locations met this criterion.
Geographic Targeting via QCTs
x icon72% of locations met this criterion.
Neighborhood Risk/Vulnerability Mapping
x icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Community Engagement

middleMiddle

Did the jurisdiction engage community members in decision making about the ARPA funds, conduct targeted outreach to historically excluded communities, and implement strategies to reach underserved communities?

Broad Community Engagement
checkmark icon94% of locations met this criterion.
Targeted Outreach
x icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Engagement
checkmark icon54% of locations met this criterion.

Equitable Labor Practices

middleMiddle

Does the jurisdiction use best practices for ensuring public investments deliver family-supporting jobs to residents who have faced barriers to good jobs and economic prosperity?

Targeted or Local Hiring
x icon36% of locations met this criterion.
Living Wage
x icon16% of locations met this criterion.
Prevailing Wage
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
Project Labor Agreement
checkmark icon29% of locations met this criterion.
Community Benefits Agreements
x icon11% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Investments

middleMiddle

Did the jurisdiction make investments that have the potential to advance equity by targeting the communities most harmed by the pandemic and addressing systemic inequities?

Good Jobs
x icon62% of locations met this criterion.
Income and Wealth
checkmark icon71% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Business Development
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Housing Security
checkmark icon82% of locations met this criterion.
Food Security
checkmark icon63% of locations met this criterion.
Health Equity
x icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Digital Equity
x icon45% of locations met this criterion.
Early Childhood
x icon33% of locations met this criterion.
Quality Child Care
x icon32% of locations met this criterion.
Youth & School-Aged Children
x icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Community Infrastructure
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Infrastructure
x icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Community Based Organizations
checkmark icon67% of locations met this criterion.
Community Safety & Justice
x icon56% of locations met this criterion.
Policing (Negative Points)
x icon50% of locations met this criterion.
Extent of Investment (% of Spending)
24%46% is the average across all locations.
Extent of Investment (% of Projects)
38%58% is the average across all locations.

Transparency & Accountability

middleMiddle

Does the jurisdiction set performance goals, collect data to monitor progress toward equitable outcomes, and provide the public with information about how funds are being used?

Equity Outcomes
x icon55% of locations met this criterion.
Public Data
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
ARPA Website
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Performance Measures
x icon75% of locations met this criterion.

The Equity Focus of Pittsburgh's ARPA Investments

Primary Policy Area
Amount
Percentage
Housing security
$53,478,811
15.5%
Community infrastructure
$18,000,000
5.2%
Inclusive business development
$6,500,000
1.9%
Income and wealth
$4,000,000
1.2%
Community-based organizations
$100,000
0.0%
Not equity focused or unknown
$261,970,322
76.1%

$82,078,811

  of $344,049,133 funds budgeted as of July 2023 (23.9%) were equity focused
View Detailed Investments