The New School -- Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy | Budget Equity Project logo

PennsylvaniaMontgomery County

See how Montgomery County performed on our equity assessment of its ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Fund investment strategy.

Total Equity Focused ARPA Funds

$123,161,266$123,161,266

Overall Score

High

ARPA Equity Assessment of Montgomery County, PA

Overall Equity Focus

highHigh

Was racial and economic equity an explicit focus of the jurisdiction's ARPA investment strategy?

Equity Conscious
checkmark icon95% of locations met this criterion.
Race Conscious
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Equity as a Priority
checkmark icon86% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Decision Making Tools and Resources

middleMiddle

Are equity tools, frameworks, and structures in place to support equitable investment project identification, design, and implementation?

Equity Principles
checkmark icon38% of locations met this criterion.

The County has a list of questions that guide the design of ARPA programs and projects. These include shedding light on historically underserved, marginalized, or adversely affected groups, as well as initiatives to make the population aware of the services offered, their access, and distribution. It also assesses if the project aims to reach universal levels of service and disaggregating outcomes by race and ethnicity.

Equity Policies
x icon24% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Framework
x icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Staffing
x icon51% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Tools
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.

Montgomery County integrated equity assessment metrics into its evaluation tools to ensure transparency and accountability in planning and data collection. The Recovery Office prioritizes equitable approaches in all activities, including multilingual communication, investments in Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs), and addressing historical inequities for disadvantaged groups. Additionally, a scoring rubric was implemented to prioritize ARPA funding for projects serving and led by communities most impacted by COVID-19 and addressing key community issues.

Data Disaggregation
x icon48% of locations met this criterion.
Geographic Targeting via QCTs
checkmark icon72% of locations met this criterion.
Neighborhood Risk/Vulnerability Mapping
x icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Community Engagement

highHigh

Did the jurisdiction engage community members in decision making about the ARPA funds, conduct targeted outreach to historically excluded communities, and implement strategies to reach underserved communities?

Broad Community Engagement
checkmark icon94% of locations met this criterion.
Targeted Outreach
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Engagement
checkmark icon54% of locations met this criterion.

Equitable Labor Practices

lowLow

Does the jurisdiction use best practices for ensuring public investments deliver family-supporting jobs to residents who have faced barriers to good jobs and economic prosperity?

Targeted or Local Hiring
x icon36% of locations met this criterion.
Living Wage
x icon16% of locations met this criterion.
Prevailing Wage
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
Project Labor Agreement
x icon29% of locations met this criterion.
Community Benefits Agreements
x icon11% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Investments

highHigh

Did the jurisdiction make investments that have the potential to advance equity by targeting the communities most harmed by the pandemic and addressing systemic inequities?

Good Jobs
checkmark icon62% of locations met this criterion.
Income and Wealth
checkmark icon71% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Business Development
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Housing Security
checkmark icon82% of locations met this criterion.
Food Security
checkmark icon63% of locations met this criterion.
Health Equity
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Digital Equity
checkmark icon45% of locations met this criterion.
Early Childhood
checkmark icon33% of locations met this criterion.
Quality Child Care
checkmark icon32% of locations met this criterion.
Youth & School-Aged Children
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Community Infrastructure
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Infrastructure
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Community Based Organizations
checkmark icon67% of locations met this criterion.
Community Safety & Justice
checkmark icon56% of locations met this criterion.
Policing (Negative Points)
x icon50% of locations met this criterion.
Extent of Investment (% of Spending)
83%46% is the average across all locations.
Extent of Investment (% of Projects)
87%58% is the average across all locations.

Transparency & Accountability

highHigh

Does the jurisdiction set performance goals, collect data to monitor progress toward equitable outcomes, and provide the public with information about how funds are being used?

Equity Outcomes
checkmark icon55% of locations met this criterion.
Public Data
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
ARPA Website
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Performance Measures
checkmark icon75% of locations met this criterion.

The Equity Focus of Montgomery's ARPA Investments

Primary Policy Area
Amount
Percentage
Housing security
$29,367,943
19.8%
Health equity
$25,054,856
16.9%
Youth and school-aged children
$24,125,359
16.3%
Quality child care
$8,760,000
5.9%
Food security
$8,644,054
5.8%
Income and wealth
$8,589,182
5.8%
Good jobs
$6,950,000
4.7%
Inclusive business development
$5,203,758
3.5%
Community infrastructure
$3,418,942
2.3%
Early childhood
$1,479,172
1.0%
Community safety and justice
$750,000
0.5%
Community-based organizations
$340,000
0.2%
Equity infrastructure
$278,000
0.2%
Digital equity
$200,000
0.1%
Not equity focused or unknown
$25,341,236
17.1%

$123,161,266

  of $148,502,502 funds budgeted as of July 2023 (82.9%) were equity focused
View Detailed Investments