The New School -- Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy | Budget Equity Project logo

WisconsinMilwaukee County

See how Milwaukee County performed on our equity assessment of its ARPA Local Fiscal Recovery Fund investment strategy.

Total Equity Focused ARPA Funds

$86,338,566$86,338,566

Overall Score

High

ARPA Equity Assessment of Milwaukee County, WI

Overall Equity Focus

highHigh

Was racial and economic equity an explicit focus of the jurisdiction's ARPA investment strategy?

Equity Conscious
checkmark icon95% of locations met this criterion.
Race Conscious
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Equity as a Priority
checkmark icon86% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Decision Making Tools and Resources

highHigh

Are equity tools, frameworks, and structures in place to support equitable investment project identification, design, and implementation?

Equity Principles
checkmark icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Milwaukee established three strategic objectives to guide ARPA fund allocation: creating intentional inclusion, bridging the gap in access to quality services, and investing in equity.

Equity Policies
checkmark icon24% of locations met this criterion.

In 2020, Milwaukee passed an ordinance committing the City to advance racial equity and eliminate health disparities.

Equity Framework
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.

The County established a Racial Equity Framework to inform all proposed ARPA projects, programs, and services. All suggested projects must align with this framework and demonstrate how they will advance health and racial equity goals.

Equity Staffing
checkmark icon51% of locations met this criterion.

Milwaukee has established an Office of Equity (OOE) which provides advice and guidance to county leaders, divisions, boards and commissions, and municipalities to foster a more equitable community.

Equity Tools
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.

Milwaukee’s ARPA Task Force established an investment evaluation criteria including if the project enables the County to make progress toward racial equity, provides support for historically underserved, marginalized, or adversely affected groups, and improves service delivery and reduces health disparities.

Data Disaggregation
checkmark icon48% of locations met this criterion.
Geographic Targeting via QCTs
checkmark icon72% of locations met this criterion.
Neighborhood Risk/Vulnerability Mapping
x icon38% of locations met this criterion.

Community Engagement

highHigh

Did the jurisdiction engage community members in decision making about the ARPA funds, conduct targeted outreach to historically excluded communities, and implement strategies to reach underserved communities?

Broad Community Engagement
checkmark icon94% of locations met this criterion.
Targeted Outreach
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Engagement
checkmark icon54% of locations met this criterion.

Equitable Labor Practices

middleMiddle

Does the jurisdiction use best practices for ensuring public investments deliver family-supporting jobs to residents who have faced barriers to good jobs and economic prosperity?

Targeted or Local Hiring
checkmark icon36% of locations met this criterion.
Living Wage
x icon16% of locations met this criterion.
Prevailing Wage
x icon70% of locations met this criterion.
Project Labor Agreement
x icon29% of locations met this criterion.
Community Benefits Agreements
checkmark icon11% of locations met this criterion.

Equity Investments

middleMiddle

Did the jurisdiction make investments that have the potential to advance equity by targeting the communities most harmed by the pandemic and addressing systemic inequities?

Good Jobs
x icon62% of locations met this criterion.
Income and Wealth
x icon71% of locations met this criterion.
Inclusive Business Development
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Housing Security
checkmark icon82% of locations met this criterion.
Food Security
checkmark icon63% of locations met this criterion.
Health Equity
checkmark icon81% of locations met this criterion.
Digital Equity
x icon45% of locations met this criterion.
Early Childhood
checkmark icon33% of locations met this criterion.
Quality Child Care
x icon32% of locations met this criterion.
Youth & School-Aged Children
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Community Infrastructure
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Equity Infrastructure
checkmark icon31% of locations met this criterion.
Community Based Organizations
x icon67% of locations met this criterion.
Community Safety & Justice
checkmark icon56% of locations met this criterion.
Policing (Negative Points)
checkmark icon50% of locations met this criterion.
Extent of Investment (% of Spending)
67%46% is the average across all locations.
Extent of Investment (% of Projects)
57%58% is the average across all locations.

Transparency & Accountability

highHigh

Does the jurisdiction set performance goals, collect data to monitor progress toward equitable outcomes, and provide the public with information about how funds are being used?

Equity Outcomes
checkmark icon55% of locations met this criterion.
Public Data
checkmark icon70% of locations met this criterion.
ARPA Website
checkmark icon64% of locations met this criterion.
Performance Measures
checkmark icon75% of locations met this criterion.

The Equity Focus of Milwaukee's ARPA Investments

Primary Policy Area
Amount
Percentage
Health equity
$34,383,493
26.8%
Housing security
$26,646,685
20.7%
Community infrastructure
$7,804,078
6.1%
Youth and school-aged children
$7,026,974
5.5%
Equity infrastructure
$6,087,500
4.7%
Community safety and justice
$1,751,200
1.4%
Early childhood
$1,538,636
1.2%
Food security
$1,100,000
0.9%
Not equity focused or unknown
$42,196,797
32.8%

$86,338,566

  of $128,535,363 funds budgeted as of July 2023 (67.2%) were equity focused
View Detailed Investments